Mandatory regular leave also low discretionary status
https://gyazo.com/0ec4c8da6d079f2345b443b4e7e15a72
https://twitter.com/vaaaaanquish/status/1123560900101672962
The benefits packages talked about in NTT retirement entries "eh...that's not common in the IT industry..." are increasing, so it's time for a turnaround move opportunity from HR PR.
I'm an outsider to NTT, but I feel that the degree to which the regular leave day is enforced is quite high. We've been doing this for more than 10 years now, and it's well established.
When I saw this exchange, I was shocked and said, "What, you think it's positive that people are forced to leave work on time?
(Maybe it's an antonymic joke.)
My understanding is that a state in which each individual is able to self-determination how to use his/her life is a good state, and a state in which "uniformly forcing everyone to act in a certain way" is a bad state. Therefore, forced overtime work and forced leaving work on time are equally bad.
Some people consider C to be a white company based on the amount of overtime work y whether business that exploits its employees (e.g. unpaid overtime, etc.) or not.
On the other hand, from a perspective that emphasizes individual self-determination x, both C and A are bad.
It is not written here, but it is out of bounds to violate the laws and regulations.
forced closing of a business or office (e.g. due to taxation) also discretion is low
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/強制的定時退社も裁量が低い状態. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.